Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Cardiac troponin I in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from a meta-analysis.
Lippi G1, Lavie CJ2, Sanchis-Gomar F3.
1 Section of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
2 John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School – The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
3 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia and INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: email@example.com.
To the Editor:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging outbreak caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to updated statistics released by the World Health Organization (WHO), COVID-19 has already affected over 110,000 people from over 100 countries worldwide, causing >3800 deaths.1 In up to 15% of infected patients the clinical course of this pathology may be complicated by the onset of a severe form of intestinal pneumonia, which may then progress towards acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and/or multi organ failure (MOF) and death.2 People with underlying cardiovascular disease are among the highest risk individuals for severe disease and death. Importantly, among the COVID-19 knowledge gaps are laboratory and diagnostics issues as well as the clinical management of severe and critically ill patients.3 Since major cardiac complications have been reported to develop in a considerable number of patients with pneumonia,4 we performed an analysis of the current scientific literature to investigate whether the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) or cardiac troponin T (cTnT) may help predict clinical severity in patients with COVID-19.
An electronic search was carried out in Medline (PubMed interface), Scopus and Web of Science, using the keywords “laboratory” OR “troponin” AND “coronavirus 2019” OR “2019-nCoV” OR “SARS-CoV-2”, between 2019 and present time (i.e., March 4, 2020), without applying language restrictions. The title, abstract and full text of all documents identified with these search criteria were assessed, and those reporting information on cTnT or cTnI values in COVID-19 patients with or without severe disease (i.e., those needing mechanical ventilation, ICU admission or those who died), were included in a meta-analysis. The reference lists of all documents were also analyzed for identifying additional eligible studies. A meta-analysis was finally carried out, with calculation of standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of cTnI or cTnT values in COVID-19 patients with or without severe disease. The statistical analysis was performed with MetaXL, software Version 5.3 (EpiGear International Pty Ltd., Sunrise Beach, Australia). Mean and standard deviation of cTnI or cTnT values were extrapolated from sample size, median and interquartile range (IQR), according to Hozo et al.5
Overall, 81 documents could be initially identified based on our search criteria, 78 of which ought to be excluded after title, abstract or full text reading, since they were review articles (n = 6), commentaries or other editorial materials (n = 1), they did not deal with COVID-19 disease (n = 65), or did not expressly report the values of cTnI or cTnT in COVID-19 patients with or without severe disease (n = 6). One additional study could be identified from reading the reference list of the three selected documents, so that 4 studies were finally included in our meta-analysis.6., 7., 8., 9.
All these clinical studies used cTnI (the specific method was not described in the published articles), and all except one7 reported the use of high-sensitivity immunoassays. All studies were set in China, included a total number of 341 patients (123 with severe disease; 36%), the sample size varied between 12 and 150, whilst the clinical outcome was defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 2 studies6,8 onset of ARDS in another study,7 and death in the remaining investigation.9 The SMD of the four studies is summarized in Fig. 1. Although the heterogeneity was considerably high (i.e., I2, 98%; p < 0.001), the values of cTnI were found to be significantly increased in COVID-19 patients with severe disease than in those without (SMD, 25.6 ng/L; 95% CI, 6.8–44.5 ng/L).
Recent literature data has shown that cTnI concentration is only marginally increased in all patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereby values exceeding the 99th percentile in the upper reference limit (URL) can only be observed in 8–12% of positive cases.10 Nonetheless, what seems to emerge from our results is that cTnI values are significantly increased in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those with milder forms of disease. It is hence reasonable to hypothesize that initial measurement of cardiac damage biomarkers immediately after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as longitudinal monitoring during hospital stay, may help identifying a subset of patients with possible cardiac injury and thereby predict the progression of COVID-19 towards a worse clinical picture. Urgent studies shall also be planned to define whether or not echocardiographic testing and other adjunctive cardioprotective therapies such as corticosteroids, other anti-inflammatory agents, immunosuppressants, antivirals (antiviral agents and/or interferons) and/or immunomodulatory therapy (immunoglobulins) may be advisable in patients with significant elevation of cardiac injury biomarkers.
Fig 1. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with or without severe disease.